Statutes of Limitations

Statutes of limitation on their surface may seem simpleyear "outside limitation." The California medical
to apply and there are many locations on the webmalpractice statute of limitations provides that actions
where those who consider that they have legal rightsagainst health care providers must be filed within 1
may look to find the state statute of limitations whichyear of the date that the malpractice victim discovers
applies to their claim. Half of those who are likely toor reasonably should have "discovered his cause of
look up this information want to find out if the statuteaction; but even if the cause of action is not
of limitations has expired on their case. The other halfdiscovered, and even where it could not have been
may want to assure themselves that they have plentydiscovered, the action is barred after the passing of
of time left on their statute of limitations so they canthree years from the date of the malpractice.
attend to matters more pressing matters than theLet's take a couple of real cases, prosecuted by the
lawsuit, such as seeking out the right medical care andauthor of this article. In the first, an expectant mother
concentrating on their rehabilitation.sought the care of a physician who dispensed to her a
This is not an article intended to advise you about thesedative as recommended by a well known drug
statute of limitations which might be applicable to yourmanufacturer. The drug caused the mother no side
case. To the contrary, and much more important foreffects, but her child was born with serious limb
you to learn right now, the purpose of this article is todefects. The drug was later identified in the press
urge that you not to look up the statute of limitationsworld wide as a potent teratogenic, although by its
yourself. Instead you should seek the advice of aEuropean name, not by the brand name under which it
competent and knowledgeable lawyer in your state towas dispensed in the United States, and so the mother
advise you with regard to the statute of limitations, ashad no idea that it was the drug that caused her
well as other statutes providing time sensitive rules thatdaughter's limb defects. The child was born in 1962,
may deprive you of your right to sue long before lastand she showed up at our law offices an adult, 29
day to file suit provided by the statute of limitations. Ifyears later. In the meantime, the first special California
you want correct information, you will require counselmedical malpractice statute of limitations was enacted
fully knowledgeable about your state statute ofin 1970, providing a 1 year discovery rule and most
limitations including how it has been interpreted by yoursignificant here, a 4 year outside limitation. The mother
state courts of appeals in the volumes of pertinenthadn't filed suit during the girl's minority, and the girl, now
case law, knowledgeable also about the exceptions toa young woman, didn't file her case within the four
the statutes of limitation, and the other legal theoriesyears. In 1975 a second version of the malpractice
which can undercut the statute of limitations defense.statute was enacted, providing for a three year
We will try to highlight the dangers of your simplyoutside rule statute of limitations. Because the young
looking up the statute of limitations applicable to yourwoman was still unaware of the cause of her birth
type of case and then making decisions on your owndefects again this three year time passed without her
that your case is barred and your rights lost, or thatfiling suit.
you can safely delay filing your complaint to attend toWhen the woman described her injuries to this author,
more pressing matters.they seemed to coincide with the injuries caused by
As examples, we will explore the two most commonthe potent teratogen, and so we obtained the list of
statute of limitations questions we receive, the firstphysicians to whom the drug company supplied the
inquiring about the statute of limitations in auto accidentdrug. Her mother's physician, it turned out, was one of
cases, a common question just because there is morethem.
accident litigation than any other type of litigation. It is aBut relevant here, the solution to the medical
good question to select also because people mightmalpractice statute of limitations was to file a complaint
think it so straightforward that anyone should be ablealleging that the physician "intentionally concealed" his
to correctly interpret the statute of limitations. Themalpractice from the mother and child, intentional
second example is the inquiry about the statute ofconcealment being the antidote to the medical
limitations in medical malpractice litigation, commonmalpractice statute of limitations defense. The author
because in many states the medical and insurancehad to fight this out in court, first to defeat the
industries have obtained special interest "tort reform"physician's and drug company's demurrer to the
legislation commonly including more restrictive statutescomplaint and then in overcoming their motions of both
of limitation with "outside limitations," also permitting usfor summary judgment. But upon succeeding on those
to discuss a "discovery rule."motions, the defendants settled the case for
There are both federal and state statutes of limitation$1,500,000.00, which was compensation this young
with most cases arising in the state court systems andwoman would not have received if she had just
so we will pick the 2 year statute of limitation forlooked up the California statute of limitations and
injuries sustained in auto accidents, and the 1 yeardecided that her case was time-barred.
discovery rule and 4 year outside rule applicable toNow to take a medical malpractice case in which if the
medical malpractice cases under California law. Againclients had considered the 1 year discovery rule they
this is not to provide information for you to rely upon inwould surely have concluded that they had waited too
deciding whether your claim is barred, or conversely tolong to sue. In this case, the author of this article
lull you to feel you can safely delay filing suit while yourepresented 10 clients, all of whom discovered their
attend to more pressing matters. Rather, it is tocauses of action against three physicians and a
demonstrate why you should not attempt to interprethospital much longer than 1 year prior to the filing of
even what might seem to be the most straightforwardtheir complaints. Indeed, all readily admitted at their
of statutes of limitation. Leave the interpretation ofdepositions that they had known of their physicians
statutes of limitations to the lawyers. Attorneys will bemalpractice and their physical harm from the
pleased to speak with you about you case. Just askmalpractice more than a year prior to coming to this
for a free case consultation.author for representation. This again led the attorneys
So, let's imagine that through your research youfor the defendant physicians and hospital to file
discover that California has a 2 year statute ofmotions for summary judgment on the grounds that
limitations applicable to auto accidents. What I wouldthe 1 year discovery rule set forth in the California
hope to demonstrate here is that this is verymedical malpractice statute of limitations had passed.
dangerous information for the injured auto accidentBut your author had anticipated that the statute of
victim to rely upon, one who might have beenlimitations defense would be vigorously asserted, and
paralyzed, or brained damaged or who might haveso we alleged in the complaint that the physicians and
suffered debilitating internal injuries, catastrophichospital were "co-conspirators." Conspiracy is a legal
orthopedic injuries or a limb amputation. He or she maytheory little used by most lawyers, but it has many
read about the 2 year statute of limitations and beadvantages, including to avoid the bar of the statute of
lulled into waiting to file suit, for example to deal withlimitations. It is also a relatively easy theory to prove in
the medical decisions and rehabilitation, or in smallermany cases, simply that one or more people
cases perhaps to see if his injury might resolve."concurred" to do something that was "wrongful," and
If he delays even just a few months, the injured autothat one of them committed an act in furtherance of
accident victim can suffer the loss of his case or maythe conspiracy. And if the lawyer can establish just
lose the right to sue his primary defendant and all orthese few facts, then the rule is that the statute of
most of what he might have recovered in his case iflimitations on the substantive causes of action, like
he had only acted promptly. This may occur, formedical malpractice, will not "commence to run,"
example, where there are other provisions of lawmeaning that the time period will not begin to run, until
providing much shorter periods than the statute of"the last overt act in furtherance of the conspiracy."
limitations within which the accident victim must act toAs was also easily established, two of the three
preserve his right to sue. One example of such lawsdefendant doctors were still involved in providing their
existing in many states, including California, is thepatients the same below standard medical care,
"government claims provisions." These requirementscontinuing "overt acts" in furtherance of the conspiracy
apply in a wide variety of auto accident cases, forthrough the date when your author sued them, and so
example where a contributing cause of the accident isthe Court rejected the defendants motions for
a road design defect or failure to properly maintain asummary judgment, permitting the cases to go to trial
roadway. The government claims provisions wouldagainst all 3 doctors and the hospital. The author tried
also apply if the driver who hit you was a city orthe cases of 5 of his 10 clients in a single consolidated
county or state employee at the time of the accident,4 month medical and hospital malpractice trial, obtaining
operating his car in the course and scope of hisa 2.9 million dollar jury verdict, including a 1.9 million dollar
employment.punitive damage verdict against the hospital.
In each of these cases the injured auto accident victimAgain, if these clients had merely considered the text
must file a government claim with the city or county orof the California medical malpractice statute of
state within 6 months, a time period obviously muchlimitations, they likely would have come to the
shorter than the 2 year California statute of limitationsconclusion that the 1 year discovery rule barred them
applicable in auto accident cases.from filing suit. We discuss the subject more fully on
In the example of the driver who turned out to be aour "California statute of limitations", page, but the
government employee, yes, of course, you might stillpurpose there as it is here is not to make you wiser in
sue the driver of the car, but if he has a 15/30,000interpreting statutes of limitations. There are literally
dollar auto insurance liability policy, that will be of littlevolumes upon volumes of case law interpreting the
consolation to the brain damaged or paraplegic plaintiff.nuances statutes of limitations, their exceptions and
On the other hand, if the same man or woman haddefenses.
consulted an appropriately qualified lawyer, the lawyerNo, the purpose is the opposite, to warn you not to
would have recognized the need to timely file thedecide for yourself that your claim is barred by the
government claim within 6 months of the date of thestatute or limitation, or the contrary, that you can safely
accident, and he would have followed the other claimswait for a year or two before filing your legal action.
procedures essential to file suit against a public entity.Statute of limitations analyses, and the related
The client could then have obtained full recovery foranalyses such as those described above, which might
his injury, his general damages, his pain and suffering,lead to a client losing his rights earlier than the date
his damages for loss of enjoyment of life, his past andprovided by the statute of limitations, or the opposite,
future medical expenses, and full recompense for hisproviding the exception or otherwise delaying the
past and future earnings losses.commencement or extending the statute of limitations,
Turning now to the statute of limitations for medicalpermitting what might have appeared a dead claim to
malpractice, and why we urge that you should notfind its day in court, should wisely be deferred to
attempt to interpret it, apply it, act upon it or fail to actcompetent, highly experienced and knowledgeable
upon it without first obtaining competent legal advice,lawyers.
lets consider California's 1 year "discovery rule," and 3